Peter Schiff, a well-known economist and long-time gold advocate, has surprised the financial world with a candid admission about Bitcoin. Despite years of vocal skepticism toward the leading cryptocurrency, Schiff recently acknowledged his biggest regret: not buying Bitcoin when he first learned about it.
While he continues to champion gold as a superior store of value, his recent remarks signal a nuanced shift in perspective—one that reflects the growing influence and market resilience of digital assets.
Peter Schiff’s Unexpected Bitcoin Regret
For over a decade, Peter Schiff has positioned himself as one of Bitcoin’s most prominent critics. A staunch supporter of precious metals, he has repeatedly dismissed Bitcoin as a speculative bubble with no intrinsic value. Yet, in a striking reversal, Schiff took to social media to admit: “I regret not buying it when I first learned about it.”
This confession came amid a powerful surge in Bitcoin’s price, briefly surpassing $110,000 and reigniting debates about its long-term viability. While Schiff maintains that Bitcoin lacks the stability of gold, his acknowledgment highlights a growing reality—even the most skeptical minds are beginning to recognize Bitcoin’s unprecedented market impact.
👉 Discover how market skeptics are reevaluating digital assets in today’s evolving economy.
His comments were not just a personal reflection but also a response to shifting investor sentiment. With institutional adoption accelerating and Bitcoin ETFs driving massive inflows, the narrative around cryptocurrency is maturing beyond mere speculation.
Max Keiser Responds: “Worst Money Manager Ever!”
Unsurprisingly, Schiff’s admission didn’t go unnoticed by Bitcoin advocates. Max Keiser, a filmmaker and outspoken Bitcoin evangelist, wasted no time responding. On X (formerly Twitter), Keiser mocked Schiff’s hesitation, pointing out that he had personally urged Schiff to buy Bitcoin at prices as low as $1, $10, $100, and even $10,000.
Keiser went further, labeling Schiff the “WORST MONEY MANAGER EVER!”—a provocative jab aimed at emphasizing how missed opportunities can define financial legacies. He also criticized Schiff’s decision to open a bank in Puerto Rico, suggesting it symbolizes outdated financial thinking in an era defined by decentralized innovation.
Despite the public feud, Keiser’s reaction underscores a broader truth: Bitcoin has rewarded early believers while challenging traditional views of money and value. The clash between gold and digital scarcity is no longer theoretical—it’s playing out in real-time market performance.
Why Bitcoin’s Recent Surge Matters
Bitcoin’s latest price rally isn’t just another volatile spike—it reflects deeper structural changes in the crypto ecosystem. According to on-chain analytics firm Glassnode, a “unique dynamic” is unfolding in this market cycle:
- Long-term holders (LTHs) are realizing record profits—averaging $930 million in net realized profit per day—while simultaneously increasing their holdings.
- Unlike previous cycles where profit-taking led to sell-offs, today’s investors are holding firm, indicating stronger conviction.
- The rise of spot Bitcoin ETFs has fueled institutional accumulation, adding legitimacy and sustained demand.
This behavior marks a historic shift. For the first time, massive profitability is coexisting with continued accumulation—a sign of maturing market psychology and growing confidence in Bitcoin’s long-term trajectory.
Key Trends Driving Institutional Interest
- ETF-led demand: U.S.-based spot Bitcoin ETFs have attracted billions in inflows, making crypto accessible to mainstream investors.
- Corporate balance sheet adoption: Companies like Metaplanet are now reporting significant revenue growth from Bitcoin holdings.
- Regulatory clarity: With the SEC potentially shortening crypto ETF approval timelines to 75 days, regulatory uncertainty is decreasing.
These developments suggest that Bitcoin is transitioning from a speculative asset to a recognized component of diversified portfolios.
👉 See how institutional investors are reshaping the future of digital finance.
Gold vs. Bitcoin: A Store of Value Debate
At the heart of Schiff’s critique remains a fundamental belief: gold is the ultimate store of value. He argues that Bitcoin’s volatility makes it unreliable for preserving wealth over time. While he acknowledges its price appreciation, he warns against conflating short-term gains with long-term stability.
However, supporters counter that Bitcoin’s fixed supply (capped at 21 million coins) offers a level of scarcity unmatched by gold, which continues to be mined at scale. Additionally, Bitcoin’s portability, divisibility, and resistance to censorship give it functional advantages in a digital-first world.
The debate isn’t just economic—it’s philosophical. Gold represents centuries of trust in physical assets; Bitcoin represents trust in code, decentralization, and mathematical certainty.
FAQ: Addressing Common Questions
Q: Did Peter Schiff ever recommend buying Bitcoin?
No. Schiff has consistently advised against investing in Bitcoin, promoting gold and silver instead. His recent regret is personal—he wishes he had bought BTC despite his public stance.
Q: Why are long-term holders selling now?
Many long-term holders are taking partial profits after years of holding. However, data shows they’re reinvesting or holding onto core positions, suggesting confidence in future growth.
Q: Is Bitcoin replacing gold as a safe-haven asset?
Not yet—but it’s gaining ground. While gold remains dominant in traditional finance, Bitcoin is increasingly viewed as “digital gold” due to its scarcity and hedge against inflation.
Q: Can Bitcoin maintain its price above $100K?
Sustaining such highs depends on macroeconomic factors, regulatory developments, and continued institutional adoption. Analysts from Standard Chartered predict prices could reach $135K by Q3 2025 and $200K by year-end.
Q: What role do ETFs play in Bitcoin’s growth?
Spot Bitcoin ETFs allow traditional investors to gain exposure without managing private keys. This ease of access has driven massive capital inflows and reduced barriers to entry.
Q: Should I invest in Bitcoin or gold?
Diversification may be optimal. Gold offers stability; Bitcoin offers high growth potential. Your choice should align with risk tolerance, investment horizon, and belief in digital transformation.
The Bigger Picture: A Changing Financial Landscape
Peter Schiff’s regret isn’t just about one missed trade—it reflects a broader transformation in finance. The rise of Bitcoin challenges long-held assumptions about money, value, and trust. Whether through ETFs, corporate treasuries, or global adoption, digital assets are becoming integral to modern wealth strategies.
While debates over volatility and intrinsic value will continue, the data speaks clearly: Bitcoin is no longer on the fringe. It’s at the center of a financial evolution—one that rewards foresight, adaptability, and openness to change.
👉 Join the next wave of financial innovation and explore what digital assets mean for your future.
Core Keywords:
- Peter Schiff
- Bitcoin regret
- Gold vs Bitcoin
- Long-term holders
- Bitcoin price surge
- Store of value
- Institutional adoption
- Spot Bitcoin ETF
As markets evolve, so too must our understanding of what constitutes true value. Whether you’re team gold or team crypto, one thing is certain: the conversation has changed—and it’s only getting louder.