In a groundbreaking development, Hong Kong’s Investment Promotion Agency has approved a high-profile case where an applicant successfully secured investment immigration status by using 30 million HKD worth of Ethereum (ETH) as proof of assets. This isn’t the first time crypto has cleared the bar—back in October last year, a Bitcoin-based application was also accepted. On the surface, it appears that cryptocurrency holders have discovered a new pathway to Hong Kong residency. However, the reality is far more complex. While digital assets are recognized, many wealthy investors are hitting a major roadblock: proof of source of funds (SOF).
This article dives into how crypto fits into Hong Kong’s updated immigration framework, the real challenges applicants face, and what you need to do to position yourself for success.
👉 Discover how digital assets are reshaping global investment migration—click here to learn more.
Understanding Hong Kong’s New Capital Investor Entry Scheme
Launched as part of the 2025 policy update, the New Capital Investor Entry Scheme (CIES) requires applicants to demonstrate beneficial ownership of at least 30 million HKD in qualifying assets. These include traditional holdings like stocks, bonds, real estate, and bank deposits—but notably now extend to virtual assets, including Bitcoin and Ethereum.
Applicants must allocate their investment as follows:
- 27 million HKD into approved financial assets or non-residential real estate
- 3 million HKD into a designated innovation-focused investment portfolio supporting tech and strategic industries
The inclusion of digital assets marks a significant shift, reflecting Hong Kong’s ambition to become a global hub for fintech and virtual asset innovation.
Why Cryptocurrency Is Accepted as Proof of Assets
Cryptocurrencies are eligible under the CIES due to two key reasons:
- No Explicit Exclusion: The government has not barred digital assets. As long as a registered accountant can verify ownership and value, crypto holdings can be included in asset declarations.
- Precedent and Market Demand: With growing institutional adoption and regulatory clarity in Hong Kong—such as the licensing framework for Virtual Asset Service Providers (VASPs) under the SFC—crypto is increasingly treated like any other financial instrument.
However, eligibility doesn’t mean ease of approval. The real challenge lies not in proving what you own, but how you acquired it.
The Hidden Hurdle: Source of Funds (SOF) Verification
While holding 30 million HKD in ETH may seem sufficient, immigration authorities demand a clear audit trail. This is where many crypto investors stumble.
Common SOF Challenges for Crypto Holders
- Lack of Historical Records: Early adopters often acquired crypto through mining, peer-to-peer trades, or gifts—methods that rarely leave formal financial documentation.
- Exchange Compliance Gaps: Platforms like FTX or even major exchanges have faced regulatory scrutiny, leading to incomplete or non-verifiable transaction histories.
- Pseudonymity vs. Identity Verification: Blockchain is transparent, but wallets are not inherently tied to real-world identities. Without verified KYC data or custodial proof, linking a wallet to an individual becomes difficult.
Example: An investor bought BTC in 2017 for 1 million HKD using cash or unrecorded transfers. Today, that holding is worth 10 million HKD. Without verifiable purchase records or tax filings, proving the legitimacy of the original capital becomes nearly impossible.
Immigration officers are trained to detect money laundering risks. Unexplained wealth, especially in volatile assets like crypto, raises red flags—even if the funds are legitimate.
👉 See how compliant crypto investors are navigating international residency programs today.
The Accountant’s Dilemma: Balancing Compliance and Innovation
Under Hong Kong’s framework, a Certified Public Accountant (CPA) must issue an independent report verifying asset ownership and value. Yet many accountants are hesitant or unprepared to handle crypto due to:
- Valuation Volatility: Should the valuation be based on the market price at application time, or an average over a period? There's no standardized approach yet.
- Anti-Money Laundering (AML) Liability: If an accountant signs off on funds with unclear origins, they could face professional or legal consequences.
- Technical Complexity: Verifying wallet ownership requires blockchain analytics tools, proof of key control, and sometimes cold storage verification—skills outside traditional accounting.
As a result, only specialized firms with crypto expertise are willing to take on these cases—and they come at a premium.
How to Prepare for a Successful Application
For crypto-native investors aiming to use digital assets in their immigration strategy, early preparation is critical.
1. Document Everything from Day One
Even informal records matter:
- Bank transfers to exchanges
- Exchange transaction histories
- Tax filings related to crypto gains
- Signed agreements for gifts or inheritances
Every piece builds credibility.
2. Use Regulated Platforms
Hold assets on licensed exchanges (e.g., those compliant with Hong Kong’s 9-license regime). These platforms maintain KYC records and provide auditable statements—essential for SOF verification.
3. Structure Assets Through Recognized Vehicles
The CIES explicitly accepts:
- Limited Partnership Funds (LPF)
- Open-Ended Fund Companies (OFC) managed by licensed firms
Transferring crypto into such structures not only enhances legitimacy but also demonstrates long-term investment intent.
4. Assemble a Specialized Team
Success requires collaboration between:
- Immigration lawyers familiar with CIES
- Crypto-savvy CPAs who understand blockchain forensics
- Wealth managers experienced in cross-border asset reporting
This interdisciplinary approach ensures compliance at every level.
👉 Learn how structured crypto portfolios are unlocking global mobility opportunities.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Q: Can I use any cryptocurrency for the investment immigration application?
A: Yes, as long as it can be independently valued and verified by a CPA. Bitcoin and Ethereum are most commonly accepted due to liquidity and market recognition.
Q: Do I need to liquidate my crypto to apply?
A: No. You don’t have to sell your holdings—proof of ownership and valuation is sufficient. However, some investors convert part of their portfolio into stablecoins or fiat to reduce volatility risk during processing.
Q: How far back should my financial records go?
A: Ideally, from the moment you acquired the assets. For early adopters, even partial documentation combined with sworn affidavits may help establish credibility.
Q: Are NFTs or other digital assets accepted?
A: Currently, only mainstream cryptocurrencies like BTC and ETH are reliably accepted. NFTs and tokens without clear valuation models remain high-risk for approval.
Q: Can I co-invest with my spouse?
A: Yes. Joint ownership of assets is permitted, provided both parties’ contributions and sources of funds are clearly documented.
Q: Is there a minimum holding period for crypto assets?
A: While not officially required, longer holding periods with consistent records improve trustworthiness and reduce suspicion of short-term speculation or illicit gains.
Final Thoughts
Hong Kong’s embrace of cryptocurrency in its investment immigration program is a bold step toward financial modernization. But make no mistake—this is not a loophole. The system rewards transparency, documentation, and compliance.
For crypto holders, this means treating digital wealth like traditional capital: with paper trails, professional oversight, and strategic planning. Those who act early and build robust evidence will find the door open. Others may find themselves locked out—no matter how large their wallet balance.
Core Keywords:
Hong Kong investment immigration, crypto asset proof, source of funds verification, New Capital Investor Entry Scheme, cryptocurrency and residency, blockchain compliance, CPA for crypto, digital asset valuation