The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) appears to be accelerating its review process for spot Ethereum exchange-traded funds (ETFs), sparking renewed optimism across the crypto market. Recent developments suggest a potential 180-degree shift in the SEC’s approach—though questions remain about timing, political influence, and final approval.
A Sudden Regulatory Shift Sparks Market Surge
On Monday, reports emerged that the SEC has urged exchanges to expedite updates to their 19b-4 filings—regulatory submissions detailing proposed rule changes related to new financial products. This move signals that the commission may be preparing to approve these applications ahead of a key deadline: May 23, 2025, the final determination date for VanEck’s spot Ethereum ETF proposal.
In response, Bloomberg Intelligence ETF analysts Eric Balchunas and James Seyffart raised their approval odds from 25% to 75%. However, they later clarified that this probability refers specifically to the 19b-4 approval by May 23, not full product launch.
👉 Discover how regulatory clarity could unlock the next wave of crypto investment opportunities.
The market reacted swiftly. Ethereum (ETH) surged past $3,600, peaking at $3,693—a gain of over 19% within 24 hours—reflecting growing investor confidence in near-term ETF approval.
Understanding the Two-Step Approval Process
It's crucial to distinguish between two separate regulatory hurdles:
- 19b-4 Filings: Submitted by exchanges like Cboe or Nasdaq, these proposals outline how a new product (such as an ETF) would operate within the exchange’s trading framework. The SEC must act on these by statutory deadlines.
- S-1 Filings: These are registration statements filed by the ETF issuer, containing detailed disclosures about fund structure, custody arrangements, fees, and risks. Unlike 19b-4, there is no fixed timeline for S-1 approval.
Even if the 19b-4 is approved by May 23, issuers still need S-1 clearance before trading can begin—potentially delaying actual ETF launches by weeks or even months.
This two-tiered process allows the SEC to appear cooperative while retaining control over timing. Analysts suggest the commission might use this flexibility as a strategic delay tactic, approving exchange-level rules first but dragging out final product authorization.
Political Pressure Mounts Ahead of 2025 Election
Why now? Many experts believe political dynamics are influencing the SEC’s sudden shift.
Former President Donald Trump has publicly pledged support for cryptocurrency innovation, including accepting crypto donations for his campaign and promising to make the U.S. a global hub for digital assets. Meanwhile, a bipartisan group of 12 Democratic senators recently joined Republicans in overturning the SEC’s controversial Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) 121—signaling growing cross-party consensus on crypto regulation.
With the 2025 U.S. presidential election approaching, regulators may feel increasing pressure to avoid being seen as obstructing financial innovation. A perceived anti-crypto stance could alienate younger voters and tech-savvy investors.
As one industry insider noted: “The SEC doesn’t want to be the villain in an election-year narrative about American competitiveness in fintech.”
Historical Delays Signal Pattern of Resistance
This isn’t the first time Ethereum ETF decisions have been postponed. Over recent months, the SEC has repeatedly delayed rulings on applications from major financial institutions, including:
- BlackRock
- Fidelity
- Grayscale
- VanEck
- ARK 21Shares
- Invesco Galaxy
- Hashdex
Each decision was pushed beyond initial deadlines, following a familiar pattern: announce a delay “to allow further review,” then extend to the next statutory window.
Under U.S. securities law, ETF applications follow a 240-day review cycle divided into four phases (45 + 45 + 90 + 60 days). At each stage, the SEC can approve, reject, or extend review. Final decisions typically land near the end of this period.
VanEck’s May 23 deadline is therefore pivotal—if rejected, the process resets, potentially pushing approval into late 2025 or early 2026.
👉 Stay ahead of regulatory milestones shaping the future of crypto investing.
Legal experts warn that rejection could trigger lawsuits. Following the court victory by Grayscale against the SEC in the Bitcoin ETF case, precedent now exists for judicial intervention when regulators apply inconsistent standards.
Why Ethereum ETFs Face Higher Scrutiny
Despite structural similarities to Bitcoin ETFs, Ethereum proposals face unique challenges:
1. Securities Classification Debate
The SEC previously classified ETH as a security during certain fundraising events (e.g., initial coin offerings involving ETH). While current status remains ambiguous, this history adds legal complexity.
2. Proof-of-Stake Concerns
Unlike Bitcoin’s proof-of-work model, Ethereum uses proof-of-stake (PoS), which some regulators argue increases centralization and manipulation risks due to validator concentration.
3. Market Liquidity and Manipulation Risks
Analysts like Matteo Greco of Fineqia International point to concerns about spot and futures market depth, suggesting ETH may be more vulnerable to price manipulation than BTC.
4. Limited Engagement with Issuers
Unlike during the Bitcoin ETF review process, the SEC has held few—if any—meetings with Ethereum ETF applicants. This lack of dialogue raises concerns about transparency and preparedness.
Global Precedents Offer Encouraging Signals
Despite domestic hesitation, international progress bolsters the case for approval.
In April 2025, Hong Kong regulators approved multiple spot Ethereum ETFs. Though early trading volumes remain modest, the move marks a significant regulatory milestone—demonstrating that such products can be safely structured and supervised.
U.S. policymakers may find it increasingly difficult to justify inaction while other financial hubs embrace innovation.
Core Keywords
- Spot Ethereum ETF
- SEC approval process
- 19b-4 filing
- S-1 registration
- Crypto regulation
- Ethereum price prediction
- ETF launch timeline
- U.S. crypto policy
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Q: What is a spot Ethereum ETF?
A: A spot Ethereum ETF directly holds ETH tokens and tracks their market price, allowing investors exposure without managing private keys or wallets.
Q: Does 19b-4 approval mean the ETF will launch immediately?
A: No. Even with 19b-4 approval, the ETF issuer must also secure S-1 registration clearance from the SEC—a process with no guaranteed timeline.
Q: Could the SEC reject all Ethereum ETF applications?
A: Yes—but rejection could lead to legal challenges. Courts have previously ruled against the SEC for inconsistent treatment of crypto asset classifications.
Q: How might political factors affect approval timing?
A: With the 2025 election approaching, regulators may face pressure to support innovation and maintain U.S. leadership in financial technology.
Q: Are Ethereum ETFs riskier than Bitcoin ETFs?
A: Regulators cite PoS mechanics and past securities concerns as differentiators, but structurally, both types of ETFs share similar custody and disclosure frameworks.
Q: What happens if VanEck’s application is rejected on May 23?
A: The review cycle restarts. Other pending applications would likely face further delays, pushing potential approvals into late 2025 or beyond.
While uncertainty persists, momentum is building. Whether driven by market forces, legal precedent, or political calculus, the path toward a U.S.-listed spot Ethereum ETF appears closer than ever.
👉 Learn how institutional adoption is reshaping the future of digital asset markets.