Bitcoin Cash (BCH) emerged in August 2017 as a direct response to growing concerns within the Bitcoin community about scalability, transaction speed, and rising fees. Born from a contentious hard fork of the original Bitcoin blockchain, Bitcoin Cash was designed to fulfill the vision of a peer-to-peer electronic cash system—offering faster transactions, lower fees, and greater capacity for everyday use.
At its core, BCH shares many technical similarities with Bitcoin, including a capped supply of 21 million coins, a Proof of Work (PoW) consensus mechanism, and a block reward halving every 210,000 blocks. However, its defining feature is an increased block size limit—originally raised from Bitcoin’s 1 MB to 8 MB, and later expanded to 32 MB—allowing more transactions per block and reducing network congestion.
This architectural change was proposed as a solution to Bitcoin’s growing pain points in 2017, when transaction confirmation times stretched to hours and fees spiked due to limited block space. While the broader Bitcoin community eventually adopted Segregated Witness (SegWit)—a soft fork aimed at improving efficiency—Bitcoin Cash supporters argued that increasing block size was a more direct and effective path toward scalability.
👉 Discover how blockchain innovations are shaping the future of digital payments.
The Philosophy Behind Bitcoin Cash
Proponents of Bitcoin Cash believe it aligns more closely with Satoshi Nakamoto’s original whitepaper vision: a decentralized, peer-to-peer electronic cash system usable by anyone, anywhere, for daily transactions. They argue that Bitcoin, as it evolved, began prioritizing its role as “digital gold” over its function as spendable currency.
With average transaction fees often below $0.01 and confirmation times typically under 10 minutes, BCH offers practical advantages for microtransactions and retail payments. Its design prioritizes utility over store-of-value speculation, making it an appealing option for users seeking fast, low-cost transfers.
The project is sometimes referred to as Bitcoin ABC (Adjustable Blocksize Cap), reflecting one of the primary software implementations developed by the BCH community. Despite originating from the same codebase as Bitcoin, key technical differences have shaped distinct network behaviors and philosophies.
Key Technical Features of Bitcoin Cash
Larger Block Sizes for Greater Throughput
By increasing the block size limit to 32 MB, Bitcoin Cash can process significantly more transactions per second compared to Bitcoin’s base layer. While actual average block sizes remain well below this cap—rarely exceeding 1–2 MB—the increased capacity provides headroom during peak demand.
This scalability approach contrasts with Bitcoin’s reliance on second-layer solutions like the Lightning Network. BCH developers maintain that on-chain scaling preserves decentralization and user sovereignty without requiring complex off-chain infrastructure.
Dynamic Difficulty Adjustment
Bitcoin Cash adjusts mining difficulty after each block using a Difficulty Adjustment Algorithm (DAA), unlike Bitcoin’s fixed adjustment every 2,016 blocks (approximately every two weeks). This allows BCH to respond more quickly to fluctuations in hash rate, maintaining consistent block production even if miners temporarily leave the network.
In the past, an Emergency Difficulty Adjustment (EDA) mechanism was introduced to further stabilize mining incentives during periods of low participation. However, EDA was later removed due to instability and manipulation risks. Its brief implementation contributed to BCH temporarily outpacing Bitcoin in total block count.
Schnorr Signatures and Future Upgrades
In 2019, Bitcoin Cash integrated Schnorr signatures—a cryptographic improvement over Bitcoin’s ECDSA scheme. Schnorr enables better signature aggregation, enhanced privacy, and improved scalability by reducing transaction data size. This upgrade laid groundwork for more advanced smart contract functionality and script enhancements.
Later updates also introduced support for built-in smart contract capabilities, signaling a shift toward greater programmability while maintaining BCH’s focus on efficient value transfer.
Wallets and Security Considerations
Storing Bitcoin Cash requires compatible wallets that support the BCH network. Popular options include hardware wallets like Ledger and Trezor, desktop clients such as Electrum Cash, and mobile solutions including Coinomi and Bitcoin.com Wallet.
It’s crucial to remember that Bitcoin (BTC) and Bitcoin Cash (BCH) operate on separate blockchains. Sending BTC to a BCH address—or vice versa—can result in permanent loss of funds unless recovered through specific replay protection mechanisms or wallet recovery tools.
Always verify network compatibility before initiating any transfer.
👉 Secure your digital assets with best-in-class storage solutions and practices.
Adoption and Real-World Use
While not as widely adopted as Bitcoin, Bitcoin Cash has carved out a niche in the merchant payment space. Websites like Bitcoin.com Map list thousands of businesses accepting BCH globally, though some entries may be outdated or inaccurate. Still, real-world usage exists across online retailers, gaming platforms, and remittance services where low fees and fast confirmations add tangible value.
Its utility shines in regions with underdeveloped banking infrastructure or high inflation, where individuals leverage BCH for cross-border transfers and daily purchases. However, overall adoption remains limited compared to major cryptocurrencies, partly due to lower liquidity and exchange support.
The 2018 Fork: Emergence of Bitcoin SV
In November 2018, ideological divisions within the BCH community led to another hard fork, resulting in the creation of Bitcoin Satoshi Vision (BSV). Championed by Craig S. Wright and Calvin Ayre, BSV pushed for even larger blocks—up to 2 GB—and stricter adherence to what they claimed was Satoshi’s original protocol.
The split triggered what became known as the "Hash War," a costly mining conflict between pro-BCH and pro-BSV factions. Ultimately, BSV failed to gain broad developer or community support, particularly amid controversy over Wright’s disputed identity claims. Today, BCH remains more established and actively developed than BSV.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Q: Can I use Bitcoin Cash for everyday purchases?
A: Yes. Bitcoin Cash is designed for fast, low-cost transactions, making it suitable for daily spending. Some online stores, charities, and service providers accept BCH directly.
Q: How did I receive Bitcoin Cash if I held Bitcoin in 2017?
A: At the time of the August 2017 fork, anyone holding BTC in a private wallet received an equal amount of BCH on the new chain. Exchange users had varying access depending on platform policies.
Q: Is Bitcoin Cash more scalable than Bitcoin?
A: In terms of on-chain transaction capacity, yes. With larger blocks, BCH can handle more transactions per second without relying on second-layer networks.
Q: Does Bitcoin Cash use SegWit?
A: No. Bitcoin Cash rejected SegWit implementation, favoring block size increases as the primary scalability solution.
Q: What are the risks of larger block sizes?
A: Critics argue that larger blocks could centralize mining power by favoring high-bandwidth nodes and increasing storage demands over time.
Q: Can I mine Bitcoin Cash?
A: Yes. Like Bitcoin, BCH uses Proof of Work and can be mined with compatible ASIC hardware. Mining difficulty adjusts dynamically to maintain block production stability.
Despite ongoing debates about decentralization and long-term viability, Bitcoin Cash continues to serve as a viable alternative for users prioritizing fast, affordable transactions. As blockchain ecosystems evolve, projects like BCH highlight different philosophies in balancing scalability, security, and usability.
👉 Explore how next-gen blockchain networks are redefining digital finance.