The landscape of stablecoins is undergoing a quiet but significant transformation. Tether (USDT), the most widely used stablecoin in the cryptocurrency ecosystem, is accelerating its migration from the Bitcoin-based Omni protocol to the Ethereum blockchain via the ERC20 standard. This shift reflects broader industry trends favoring faster, more scalable networks—and signals the declining relevance of legacy protocols like Omni.
Recent data shows that Tether has once again increased its issuance on Ethereum, adding another 100 million USDT to the ERC20 network. This marks the fourth such issuance in July alone, pushing the total circulating supply of USDT to approximately $38.46 billion. While Tether’s CTO clarified that these newly issued tokens do not represent fresh capital inflows, they are instead part of a strategic reallocation: replacing older Omni-USDT tokens with more efficient ERC20-USDT equivalents, which will eventually lead to the retirement of outdated Omni-based supply.
👉 Discover how blockchain transitions impact your digital assets today.
The Rise of ERC20-USDT and Decline of Omni
Currently, about 40% of all USDT in circulation exists on the Ethereum network as ERC20 tokens. However, recent trends suggest this figure is quickly climbing—some estimates indicate ERC20-USDT has already surpassed Omni-USDT in total volume. According to Ethereum developer Anthony Sassano, the growing dominance of ERC20-USDT is not just a matter of convenience but a response to real network limitations.
The Omni protocol, built atop Bitcoin’s blockchain, suffers from slow transaction speeds and high fees due to Bitcoin’s inherent design constraints. With Bitcoin averaging just 7 transactions per second and often experiencing network congestion, it struggles to support high-volume token operations. In contrast, Ethereum offers greater throughput and flexibility, making it far better suited for stablecoin activity.
As demand for fast, low-cost transfers grows, platforms are responding accordingly. Major exchanges like Binance have fully transitioned their USDT deposit systems to ERC20, while still allowing withdrawals on the Omni network. However, users can no longer deposit Omni-USDT after the switch was completed on July 4. Other platforms, including Huobi and Poloniex, now support multiple versions—Omni, ERC20, and TRC20—giving users flexibility while nudging them toward more efficient networks.
Understanding the Three Forms of USDT
Today, USDT exists in three primary forms across different blockchains:
- Omni-USDT: Originally launched on Bitcoin’s Omni layer, this version uses BTC addresses and pays BTC network fees for transfers. While historically significant, it's now seen as outdated due to scalability issues.
- ERC20-USDT: Built on Ethereum, this version uses ETH addresses and leverages the robust smart contract capabilities of the Ethereum network. It dominates in decentralized finance (DeFi) applications and offers faster confirmations.
- TRC20-USDT: Hosted on the TRON network, this variant provides ultra-low fees and rapid transactions, appealing to users focused on cost-efficiency.
Despite TRON’s aggressive incentives—such as daily staking rewards for converting to TRC20-USDT—Ethereum remains the preferred choice for institutional adoption and liquidity depth.
Why Ethereum Is Winning the Stablecoin Race
Beyond speed and cost, Ethereum offers something Omni cannot: integration with decentralized applications and lending protocols. As DeFi continues to expand, most financial primitives—from lending pools to automated market makers—require ERC20-compatible assets. This gives ERC20-USDT a structural advantage over its counterparts.
Moreover, transparency concerns surrounding Tether’s reserves have intensified calls for greater accountability. While USDT maintains a dominant market share among fiat-collateralized stablecoins, critics argue that its lack of full real-time auditing leaves room for skepticism. OKX’s strategic vice president Xu Kun emphasized that “the core of any stablecoin is trust—each token must be backed by real assets.” She noted that historical patterns show correlations between USDT issuance spikes and upward movements in cryptocurrency prices, raising questions about potential market influence.
Still, Ethereum’s open ecosystem allows for greater third-party verification through on-chain analytics tools, providing more visibility than the relatively opaque Omni environment.
👉 Learn how trust and transparency shape the future of digital finance.
Market Implications and Future Outlook
The decline of Omni-USDT doesn’t mean immediate obsolescence. Due to its large existing user base and historical holdings, many exchanges will continue supporting Omni for the foreseeable future. However, new development efforts are clearly focused elsewhere.
Notably, even EURT—the euro-backed counterpart to USDT—follows this trend. While only €16 million of EURT circulates via Omni, over €40 million exists as ERC20-EURT. This reversal underscores Ethereum’s growing role as the default platform for tokenized fiat currencies.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Q: Is Omni-USDT disappearing completely?
A: Not immediately. While Tether is actively phasing it out through replacement with ERC20-USDT, existing balances remain valid. Over time, however, support may dwindle as infrastructure shifts.
Q: Should I convert my Omni-USDT to ERC20-USDT?
A: If you frequently transact or use DeFi platforms, yes. ERC20-USDT offers faster confirmations, broader compatibility, and lower relative costs in many cases.
Q: Can I still withdraw Omni-USDT from major exchanges?
A: Most major exchanges still allow withdrawals, though some like Binance have restricted new deposits. Always check your exchange’s current policy before initiating transfers.
Q: Why is Ethereum better than Bitcoin for stablecoins?
A: Ethereum supports higher transaction throughput, programmable smart contracts, and native integration with DeFi apps—all essential for modern stablecoin usage.
Q: Does frequent USDT issuance affect crypto markets?
A: Some analysts believe large issuances correlate with bullish price movements, suggesting possible market timing. However, conclusive evidence of manipulation remains debated.
Q: Will TRC20-USDT overtake ERC20-USDT?
A: Unlikely in the short term. Despite TRON’s lower fees, Ethereum maintains superior liquidity, security, and ecosystem maturity.
The writing is on the blockchain: the future of USDT lies on Ethereum. As scalability improves with Layer 2 solutions and Ethereum’s network effects deepen, the transition away from legacy systems like Omni becomes not just logical—but inevitable.
👉 Stay ahead in the evolving world of blockchain finance—explore next-gen asset management now.