In the volatile world of cryptocurrency, few assets have inspired as much devotion—and despair—as Ethereum. Once hailed as the cornerstone of a decentralized future, ETH now finds itself at the center of a growing crisis of confidence. From plunging prices to institutional sell-offs and soul-searching among long-term holders, the narrative has shifted. What was once a revolution now feels, to many, like a collapsing dream.
This is the story of the “Ethereum Asylum”—a private group chat turned emotional refuge for disillusioned believers, where hope clashes with reality, and faith is tested by market forces beyond anyone’s control.
The Birth of the Ethereum Asylum
“Our original group name wasn’t ‘Ethereum Asylum.’ It was ‘I Was Wrong—Regret Buying Ethereum.’”
So begins the origin story of a digital support group born out of panic and pain.
On February 3, 2025, Ethereum dropped 25% in a single day, hitting a low of $2,080. For Orange (a pseudonym), a former venture capitalist who entered crypto in 2021, it was a breaking point. Already uneasy at $3,300, this crash triggered a spiral of doubt. He created a small WeChat group with five friends—all fellow ETH holders—seeking comfort in shared suffering.
But as ETH kept falling, more joined. Whales like Big Orange and Du Jun arrived. VC executives followed. Within weeks, the group swelled to exactly 250 members—a number Orange chose deliberately. “Buying Ethereum makes you a ‘two-fifty,’” he joked, referencing the Chinese slang for fool.
As hope faded, so did the voices calling for bottoms. Eventually, someone joked that anyone still shouting “Buy the dip!” should be sent to Dr. Yang Yongxin for electroshock therapy. That’s when the name changed: “Ethereum Asylum.”
DeFi Summer: The Golden Age of Ethereum
For many in the asylum, the pain cuts deeper because they weren’t gamblers—they were true believers.
Back in 2020, Ethereum was unstoppable. Uniswap’s daily volume surpassed Coinbase’s. Compound ignited the liquidity mining craze. DeFi Summer exploded across social media and developer forums.
This wasn’t just about money; it was ideological. Vitalik Buterin’s vision of a “world computer” felt real. Concepts like sharding, zero-knowledge proofs (ZK), and Layer 2 scaling painted a future where blockchain could power everything from finance to identity.
Orange recalls: “We did deep research. Vitalik and the Ethereum Foundation were selling us the future—and we bought it.”
Lin Feng, another long-term holder, bought ETH that summer fueled by idealism. “I felt proud,” he says. “This was value investing at the civilizational level.”
VCs poured billions into Ethereum’s ecosystem. Projects like zkSync (valued at $2B), Starknet ($8B), and Scroll ($1.8B) raised massive rounds based on promise alone. The narrative was clear: Ethereum would scale, dominate, and decentralize.
But after the euphoria faded, reality set in.
The Cracks Begin to Show
Fast-forward to 2025. Ethereum isn’t leading innovation—it’s playing catch-up.
“Where’s the paradigm shift?” asks Big Orange, a well-known crypto influencer and self-proclaimed “ETH Sentinel.” “There’s nothing new under the sun on Ethereum.”
DeFi activity has cooled. NFTs are stagnant. GameFi failed to deliver mass adoption. Meanwhile, chains like Solana offer speed and low fees—simple advantages that resonate with users.
Even worse? Layer 2 fragmentation is eroding Ethereum’s core strength: composability.
Each L2—Optimism, Arbitrum, Base—pulls liquidity and users off the mainnet. They capture MEV (Maximal Extractable Value) and fees while contributing little back. It’s a classic value leakage problem.
“It reminds me of ATOM,” Lin Feng warns. “In Cosmos, app-chains thrive via IBC, but ATOM itself captures almost no value. I fear ETH is going down the same path.”
👉 See how emerging blockchain trends are reshaping value distribution across networks.
Why Ethereum Feels Stuck
Several factors explain Ethereum’s stagnation:
- Lack of fresh narratives: After DeFi, NFTs, and L2s, there’s no compelling new use case capturing attention.
- Slow innovation cycle: Core upgrades like proto-danksharding are years behind schedule.
- EIP-1559 underperformance: Designed to make ETH deflationary, it only works with high transaction volume—which hasn’t materialized.
- Layer 2 disunity: While L2s scale Ethereum, they fragment UX and drain economic value from the base layer.
“The irrigation system is perfect,” Big Orange says of EIP-1559, “but there’s no water.”
Conflux co-founder Yuanjie adds: “Vitalik’s personal influence is too strong. He shapes direction through ideals, not market incentives. That leads to misallocated resources.”
And then there’s human nature: the prisoner’s dilemma.
Everyone races to deploy on L2s for airdrop farming—not to build, but to extract. The result? Homogenized dApps, bloated token supplies, and diminishing returns.
The Great Sell-Off
On April 22, 2025, ETH/BTC hit a four-year low: 0.01766 BTC.
That day, Galaxy Digital swapped ETH for SOL. Paradigm moved 5,500 ETH (~$8.66M) to Anchorage—likely preparing for sale. Even an Ethereum Foundation-linked wallet deposited 1,000 ETH (~$1.58M) into Kraken.
The irony wasn’t lost on anyone: the guardians were exiting their own castle.
Lin Feng finally sold his entire stack.
“It wasn’t just financial loss,” he admits. “It was dao xin sun huan—my belief was shattered. I entered crypto because of ETH. I called myself a value investor. Now I realize my conviction was weak.”
He didn’t just sell ETH—he sold his past self.
Yet most asylum members remain. Not because they expect recovery tomorrow—but because they’re waiting for another summer. Another spark.
Two Paths Forward: Reform or Resist?
Inside the asylum, debates rage over Ethereum’s future. Two factions have emerged:
The Pragmatists (The Right)
Led by Orange and Yuanjie, this camp believes Ethereum must evolve—or die.
- Embrace compliance: Stop fighting regulators; work within legal frameworks.
- Build business development teams: Vitalik can’t do everything. Hire lobbyists who understand Washington or Beijing.
- Prioritize utility over ideology: If Trump or Xi can help adoption, someone should talk to them—even if they’re not crypto-native.
“Foundations aren’t churches,” Yuanjie argues. “They need commercial arms.”
The Idealists (The Left)
Champions like BlueFox Notes and investor Jacob see Ethereum’s value in its principles.
- Decentralization above all
- Resistance to state control
- Trustlessness as non-negotiable
“For me,” says Jacob, “it’s simple: if Ethereum stays decentralized and secure, I stay. If it sells out for adoption? I’m gone.”
To them, chains like Solana are fast—but corporate at heart. Ethereum represents something rarer: a truly open digital commons.
Can Ethereum Be Great Again?
F2Pool co-founder WangChun offered a glimmer of hope on April 22—swapping 50 WBTC for 2,794 ETH (~$4.36M).
A vote of confidence? Perhaps.
But real revival requires more than faith.
Experts agree: Ethereum needs either:
- A successful full-scale rollup-centric roadmap, where L2s feed value back to L1.
- A paradigm-shifting application—something no other chain can replicate.
- Or a cultural reset, blending idealism with strategic pragmatism.
IOSG Ventures’ Jocy puts it best: “Ethereum won’t die. It’s Web3’s most successful decentralized organization. Hold it like you’re thinking in ten-year cycles.”
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Q: Is Ethereum dead?
A: No. While growth has slowed and competition intensified, Ethereum remains the dominant platform for DeFi, NFTs, and institutional-grade applications. Its developer activity and security are unmatched.
Q: Why is ETH losing value to Layer 2s?
A: Most transaction fees and MEV are captured by L2 sequencers instead of flowing back to Ethereum. Without mechanisms like shared sequencers or accrual models (e.g., EigenLayer), this value leak will continue.
Q: Can Ethereum recover its innovation edge?
A: Yes—but only with faster execution on core upgrades (like account abstraction and danksharding) and stronger incentives for builders to keep apps composable across layers.
Q: Should I sell my ETH?
A: This isn’t financial advice. However, consider your investment horizon: short-term traders may struggle in stagnant markets; long-term holders may benefit from eventual network upgrades and macro crypto cycles.
Q: What would make Ethereum fail?
A: Failure would come from prolonged stagnation, loss of developer mindshare to faster chains, or centralization due to regulatory compromise—especially if it abandons decentralization for scalability or compliance.
Q: Is the 'Ethereum Asylum' real?
A: Yes—it’s an actual private chat group composed of investors, VCs, and long-term ETH holders processing emotional and financial strain during bear markets.
👉 Join thousands of informed traders making smarter decisions—start your journey today.