The decentralized finance (DeFi) ecosystem has experienced explosive growth over the past few years, attracting both retail and institutional investors seeking high-yield opportunities. However, with innovation comes risk — smart contract vulnerabilities, liquidity crises, and protocol insolvencies have become all too common. To address these concerns and improve transparency, DeFi Pulse, a leading DeFi data analytics platform, has partnered with Gauntlet, a blockchain simulation and optimization firm, to launch a new risk assessment framework: the DeFi Pulse Economic Safety Grade.
This groundbreaking tool aims to standardize how users evaluate the financial resilience of DeFi protocols, especially lending platforms where depositor safety is paramount. By introducing a quantifiable metric for economic security, DeFi Pulse is helping reduce information asymmetry and empowering users to make informed decisions — a critical step toward mainstream adoption.
Understanding the DeFi Pulse Economic Safety Grade
The DeFi Pulse Economic Safety Grade evaluates DeFi protocols on a 1–100 scale, with higher scores indicating stronger resistance to insolvency under extreme market conditions. The scoring model leverages a combination of on-chain data, user behavior patterns, and market data from both centralized and decentralized exchanges to simulate real-world stress scenarios.
Key evaluation criteria include:
- Collateral volatility: How much the value of deposited assets fluctuates.
- Collateral liquidity: The ease with which collateral can be liquidated without significant slippage.
- User behavior modeling: Simulated borrowing, lending, and liquidation patterns during market shocks.
- Protocol parameters: Interest rate models, liquidation thresholds, and reserve ratios.
- Smart contract risk (currently not active in Alpha): Future integration will assess code audit status and known vulnerabilities.
"The DeFi Pulse Economic Safety Grade is created by running simulations utilizing data from centralized and decentralized exchanges combined with on-chain user data to estimate market risks. Grades are focused on the risk of insolvency — or in other words, the risk to depositors."
— DeFi Pulse (@defipulse)
Currently in Alpha phase, the tool already provides actionable insights for major lending protocols. While smart contract risk analysis remains under development, the current focus on economic design offers a much-needed lens for evaluating systemic stability.
👉 Discover how leading DeFi platforms are securing user funds with advanced risk modeling.
Aave and Compound Achieve Highest Safety Ratings
In the inaugural assessment, two of the most established DeFi lending protocols — Aave and Compound — emerged as top performers.
| Protocol | Economic Safety Score | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| Aave | 95 | Very Safe |
| Compound | 91 | Very Safe |
Both protocols demonstrated robust economic designs capable of withstanding severe market downturns. However, subtle differences in their usage patterns influenced their final scores.
According to Gauntlet’s analysis, one key differentiator was the proportion of stablecoin borrowing against non-stablecoin collateral. In times of volatility, borrowers who take out stablecoins (like DAI or USDC) using volatile assets (like ETH or WBTC) face higher liquidation risks if prices drop suddenly.
- On Aave, approximately 70% of stablecoin loans are backed by non-stablecoin collateral.
- On Compound, that figure rises to about 90%.
This higher concentration increases Compound’s exposure to cascading liquidations during sharp price drops, slightly lowering its resilience score compared to Aave. Nevertheless, both platforms maintain conservative risk parameters, frequent audits, and strong community governance — contributing to their elite safety ratings.
These results validate years of iterative improvements in DeFi lending mechanics and reinforce investor confidence in well-governed, transparent protocols.
Expanding the DeFi Ecosystem: DPI and Index Coop
Beyond risk assessment, DeFi Pulse continues to innovate across multiple fronts. In September 2025, it collaborated with Set Protocol to launch the DeFi Pulse Index (DPI) — a diversified token basket comprising ten leading DeFi assets, including UNI, AAVE, COMP, and MKR.
DPI allows investors to gain broad exposure to the DeFi sector without managing multiple positions individually. It’s rebalanced periodically based on market capitalization and usage metrics.
To ensure decentralized governance, DeFi Pulse later announced the formation of Index Coop, a decentralized autonomous organization (DAO) responsible for overseeing DPI and future index products. In October 2025, Index Coop launched its governance token, INDEX, through liquidity mining incentives.
The response was overwhelming:
- Over $24 million locked in the INDEX/ETH Uniswap pool within weeks.
- Active participation from yield farmers and long-term holders alike.
- Transparent voting mechanisms for future product development.
This move reflects a broader trend in DeFi: transitioning from centralized development teams to community-driven ecosystems where users have real influence over protocol direction.
👉 See how decentralized indexes are transforming portfolio management in Web3.
Why Risk Standardization Matters in DeFi
Unlike traditional finance, DeFi operates without intermediaries or regulatory safeguards. Users are solely responsible for assessing protocol safety — a daunting task given the complexity of smart contracts and economic models.
Without standardized risk metrics:
- Newcomers may unknowingly deposit funds into fragile or unaudited protocols.
- Yield-chasing behavior can amplify systemic risks during market stress.
- Trust remains fragmented across projects, hindering large-scale capital inflows.
The DeFi Pulse Economic Safety Grade fills this gap by offering an objective, data-driven benchmark. While not a guarantee against loss, it provides a critical starting point for due diligence — similar to credit ratings in traditional finance.
As more protocols adopt transparent risk reporting, we can expect:
- Increased investor confidence
- Lower capital costs for secure protocols
- Faster identification of emerging risks
- Greater alignment between developers and users
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Q: What does a high Economic Safety Grade mean for users?
A: A higher score indicates a lower probability of insolvency during market crashes. This means depositors are less likely to lose funds due to widespread liquidations or under-collateralized loans.
Q: Is the safety grade a guarantee of security?
A: No. The grade assesses economic resilience under simulated conditions but does not cover smart contract exploits or governance attacks. Always conduct independent research before investing.
Q: Why isn't smart contract risk included yet?
A: The current Alpha version focuses on economic design. Smart contract risk evaluation — including audit history and known vulnerabilities — is planned for future updates.
Q: How often are the ratings updated?
A: Ratings are re-evaluated regularly as market conditions change. Major updates occur monthly, with real-time alerts for significant parameter changes.
Q: Can new or smaller protocols get rated?
A: Yes. As long as sufficient on-chain and market data exists, emerging protocols can be assessed. This promotes transparency across the entire ecosystem.
Q: Where can I access the full risk reports?
A: Public summaries are available on the DeFi Pulse website. Detailed simulation data may require API access or integration with analytics platforms.
👉 Stay ahead of risks with real-time insights from top-tier DeFi analytics tools.
Final Thoughts
The launch of the DeFi Pulse Economic Safety Grade marks a pivotal moment in maturing the decentralized finance landscape. By bringing structure to risk evaluation, it empowers users — especially newcomers — to navigate DeFi with greater confidence.
With Aave and Compound setting the benchmark for safety, other protocols now have clear targets to aim for. Meanwhile, initiatives like DPI and Index Coop demonstrate how innovation extends beyond lending into asset management and decentralized governance.
As DeFi evolves from experimental playgrounds to foundational financial infrastructure, tools like this will become essential — not just for protecting capital, but for building lasting trust in open-source finance.
Core Keywords: DeFi risk assessment, Aave security rating, Compound lending safety, DeFi Pulse Economic Safety Grade, decentralized finance security, DeFi lending protocols, Index Coop DPI