Bitcoin Mining Progress Reaches 89% — Are Miners Still Influential?

·

Bitcoin has come a long way since its inception on January 3, 2009. With the mining progress now at 89%—18.73 million BTC already in circulation and only about 2.27 million left to be mined—the era of diminishing block rewards is accelerating. After three halvings, the block reward has dropped from 50 BTC to the current 6.25 BTC, and the network now produces roughly 900 new bitcoins per day. But as supply slows and market dynamics evolve, a critical question arises: Are bitcoin miners still influential players in the market?

Let’s explore how miner behavior, market structure, and network fundamentals are shifting—and what it means for the future of Bitcoin.


Miners: From Key Sellers to Silent Supporters

Historically, bitcoin miners have been considered natural sellers. Their operational costs—hardware, electricity, facility maintenance—are paid in fiat, while their income comes in BTC. To cover expenses, miners often sell a portion of their rewards, creating consistent selling pressure.

In earlier market cycles, this behavior significantly impacted price movements. With a smaller total supply and fewer institutional participants, large miner outflows could trigger price drops. But times have changed.

According to CryptoQuant, the volume of bitcoin flowing from miners to exchanges is now at a year-low, suggesting widespread "HODLing" behavior among miners. This shift indicates growing confidence in Bitcoin’s long-term value and reduced immediate selling pressure.

👉 Discover how miner behavior can signal major market shifts before they happen.

Recent data shows that over the past seven days, miners generated approximately 6,300 BTC, but only 1,725 BTC moved to exchanges—less than 1% of total exchange inflows (205,200 BTC). This minimal footprint underscores that miners are no longer the dominant force driving short-term volatility.

Meanwhile, institutional demand has surged. Grayscale alone added 199,600 BTC between October 2023 and February 2024—an average of 1,621 BTC per day, nearly double the daily mining output. Companies like MicroStrategy, Square, and Tesla have further intensified demand, creating a structural imbalance where institutional buying far outpaces new supply.

As a result, institutions now hold more value in BTC than miners do. OKLink data shows institutional holdings worth **$16.8 billion**, compared to miners’ $3.1 billion in on-chain reserves.


Market Influence Shifts to Short-Term Traders

With 89% of bitcoins already mined, the remaining supply is dwindling. In four years, the next halving will cut daily issuance to just 450 BTC, making miner sell-offs even less impactful.

So who’s driving price action today?

Glassnode’s data from May 2025 reveals that 155,000 BTC transitioned from "held" to "liquid" status—coins previously dormant are now moving. This aligns with increased profit-taking by short-term holders, including retail traders and late-cycle institutional investors who bought during the bull run.

These users—motivated by speculation or risk aversion—are now selling after substantial gains. For example:

This confirms a key insight: price volatility is increasingly driven not by miners, but by speculative holders cashing out.


Why Miner Metrics Still Matter

Despite their shrinking market influence, miner behavior remains a valuable leading indicator for several reasons:

1. Miners Reflect Long-Term Sentiment

Mining is a capital-intensive, long-term commitment. Once deployed, mining rigs operate for years. Therefore, when miners start selling aggressively, it often signals deteriorating confidence in BTC’s future price—a red flag for broader markets.

2. Puell Multiple: A Tool for Cycle Timing

The Puell Multiple—calculated as daily coin issuance value divided by its 365-day moving average—helps identify overvalued or undervalued conditions:

3. Legacy Addresses Carry Psychological Weight

Even rare events—like movements from early "Satoshi-era" addresses—can trigger panic or FOMO. A sudden transfer from a long-dormant wallet to an exchange could spark short-term volatility, regardless of actual volume.


Bitcoin vs Ethereum: The Mining Income Divergence

A striking trend emerged in May 2025: **Ethereum miners earned $2.35 billion**, surpassing Bitcoin’s $1.45 billion—a 15% drop from previous months.

Why the gap?

NetworkBlock RewardFee Income (May 2025)% of Total Revenue
BitcoinDominant$124 million8.6%
EthereumBalanced$1.03 billion43.8%

Ethereum’s booming DeFi ecosystem drives high transaction volume and fees. In contrast, Bitcoin’s primary use case has shifted from peer-to-peer payments to digital gold—a store of value rather than a medium of exchange.

This transition poses a long-term challenge: once all bitcoins are mined (estimated by 2140), miner income will rely entirely on transaction fees.

👉 See how network fees could shape Bitcoin’s sustainability after mining ends.

But current trends are concerning:

If fees remain low, will miners still have incentive to secure the network?


What Happens When Bitcoin Is Fully Mined?

Bitcoin’s design assumes that as supply becomes fixed and demand grows, price appreciation will compensate for declining block rewards. Higher prices could justify higher fees—even if transaction volume stays flat.

For example:

But challenges persist:

Ultimately, Bitcoin’s post-mining security depends on:

  1. Sustained price growth
  2. Strong demand for on-chain settlements
  3. Continued trust in decentralization

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: Do miners still affect Bitcoin’s price today?
A: Miners have far less influence than in past cycles due to lower exchange outflows and rising institutional demand. Their impact is now more psychological than mechanical.

Q: What is the Puell Multiple used for?
A: It measures miner profitability relative to historical averages and helps identify potential market tops (high values) or accumulation zones (low values).

Q: Can Bitcoin survive after all coins are mined?
A: Yes—if transaction fees rise enough to incentivize miners. This depends on Bitcoin maintaining its value proposition and seeing steady on-chain demand.

Q: Why are Ethereum miner revenues higher than Bitcoin’s?
A: Ethereum supports complex smart contracts and DeFi applications, generating significantly higher transaction fees compared to Bitcoin’s simpler payment-focused model.

Q: Are rising transaction fees good for Bitcoin?
A: Moderately high fees reflect network usage and security, but excessively high fees could reduce utility and push users toward alternatives.

Q: How much Bitcoin is left to mine?
A: Approximately 2.27 million BTC remain unmined—about 10.8% of the total 21 million cap.


With mining nearing completion, Bitcoin is transitioning from an inflationary asset to a fully scarce one. While miners’ day-to-day influence wanes, their long-term role as network guardians remains vital.

The real test lies ahead: can Bitcoin maintain sufficient economic incentives for miners—through fees and adoption—once the last block is mined?

👉 Explore how Bitcoin’s economic model evolves beyond mining rewards.