Polygon Completes London Upgrade: Can Burned MATIC Reclaim Its Public Chain Ranking?

·

The blockchain landscape is constantly evolving, and upgrades are key to maintaining competitiveness. In January 2025, Polygon executed its highly anticipated London upgrade, activating EIP-1559 on its mainnet. This pivotal change introduces a fee-burning mechanism that could reshape the network’s economic model, user experience, and long-term positioning among top public blockchains.

👉 Discover how blockchain upgrades are shaping the future of decentralized networks.

Understanding the London Upgrade and EIP-1559

EIP-1559, originally implemented on Ethereum during its August 2021 London upgrade, revolutionized transaction fee mechanics by replacing the first-price auction model with a base fee plus priority fee structure. The base fee fluctuates based on network congestion and is permanently burned, while the priority fee (tip) goes directly to validators.

For Polygon, adopting EIP-1559 marks a strategic move to enhance predictability in gas costs and introduce deflationary pressure on its native MATIC token. As of early February 2025, over 540,000 MATIC have already been burned since the upgrade went live at 3:00 UTC on January 18.

This mechanism ensures that a portion of every transaction fee is removed from circulation, potentially increasing scarcity over time—especially as network activity grows.

Why Polygon Needed This Upgrade

Polygon emerged as a leading Ethereum sidechain, designed to address core limitations of the Ethereum network: high gas fees, low throughput (transactions per second), and suboptimal user experience. By offering faster and cheaper transactions, it quickly attracted developers and users alike.

However, by early 2025, signs of strain began to show. A surge in activity from an NFT game called Sunflower caused gas prices to spike dramatically—reaching an average of 763 Gwei on January 5, compared to a typical rate of around 10 Gwei earlier in the year. At one point, nearly 40% of all gas consumption on Polygon came from this single application.

Such congestion not only degraded user experience but also threatened the network’s reputation as a scalable alternative. Validators struggled to submit blocks, and users faced unpredictable costs—undermining one of Polygon’s core value propositions.

The implementation of EIP-1559 aims to stabilize these fluctuations by making base fees algorithmically responsive to demand, thereby improving cost predictability and reducing extreme volatility during peak usage.

Impact of the Upgrade: Data Insights

To assess the effectiveness of the London upgrade, we analyze key performance indicators across three dimensions: gas pricing, network utilization, and token economics.

1. Average Gas Price Trends

While EIP-1559 doesn’t guarantee lower fees, it enhances predictability. Post-upgrade data shows that average gas prices remained elevated for several days—staying above 200 Gwei—before gradually declining toward the end of January.

This initial spike may reflect transitional behavior or lingering congestion from pre-upgrade backlogs. However, the stabilization trend suggests improved fee market efficiency over time.

👉 See how top blockchains manage transaction fees and scalability.

2. Network Utilization (Gas Used vs. Gas Limit)

One of the most significant improvements lies in network utilization stability. Prior to the upgrade, Polygon’s block space usage fluctuated between 60% and 90%, indicating inconsistent load management.

After the activation of EIP-1559, utilization dropped sharply to below 50.7% and has since remained stable. This mirrors Ethereum’s post-London behavior, where average utilization fell from ~97% to around 51%, with minimal variance.

Stable utilization means fewer spikes in congestion and more consistent transaction processing—critical for dApp developers and everyday users who rely on predictable performance.

3. MATIC Token Price Dynamics

Despite technical improvements, MATIC’s price has not seen an immediate bullish reversal. Unlike Ethereum, whose price showed positive momentum after its own London upgrade, MATIC has trended downward in early 2025.

This divergence can be attributed to broader market forces:

These external factors have overshadowed the fundamental improvements brought by the upgrade—highlighting that technological progress doesn’t always translate into short-term price gains.

Long-Term Implications for Stakeholders

The London upgrade isn’t just a technical tweak—it reshapes incentives across the ecosystem.

For Token Holders

With MATIC operating under a fixed supply model, the introduction of burning creates deflationary pressure. Simulations suggest that under normal usage levels, approximately 0.27% of total MATIC supply could be burned annually. As adoption increases and transaction volume rises, this burn rate could accelerate—potentially turning MATIC into a deflationary asset if burns exceed new issuance from staking rewards.

For Users

Users benefit from greater transparency and predictability in transaction costs. Instead of guessing competitive gas prices during congestion, they now pay a dynamically adjusted base fee (which is burned) and an optional tip for faster inclusion. This reduces overpayment and improves overall cost efficiency.

For Validators

Validators no longer receive the base fee portion of transactions—only the priority tips. While this may reduce immediate income during low-traffic periods, the long-term value accrual comes from increased token scarcity and potential appreciation of MATIC holdings due to deflationary mechanics.

Additionally, reduced spam transactions and smoother network operation lower operational risks and improve consensus stability.

Can Polygon Regain Its Former Standing?

Once ranked among the top three blockchains by Total Value Locked (TVL), Polygon has slipped to eighth place since mid-2024. Increased competition from emerging Layer 1 chains and temporary UX degradation contributed to this decline.

The London upgrade positions Polygon to reclaim lost ground by addressing foundational issues:

While short-term market conditions remain challenging, these upgrades lay the groundwork for sustainable growth. As developer activity resumes and user confidence rebuilds, Polygon may yet experience a resurgence—proving that even in bearish cycles, innovation fuels long-term resilience.

👉 Explore how economic models like token burning influence blockchain sustainability.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Q: What is EIP-1559 and how does it work on Polygon?
A: EIP-1559 introduces a base fee that adjusts with network demand and is burned after each transaction. Users also add a tip (priority fee) to incentivize validators. This makes gas fees more predictable and reduces token supply over time.

Q: How much MATIC has been burned so far?
A: As of early February 2025, over 540,000 MATIC tokens have been burned since the London upgrade launched on January 18.

Q: Does burning MATIC make it deflationary?
A: Yes—while MATIC has a fixed maximum supply, continuous burning reduces circulating supply. If burn rates exceed new token emissions from staking, MATIC can become net deflationary.

Q: Why did gas fees spike before the upgrade?
A: A surge in activity from the NFT game Sunflower consumed nearly 40% of network capacity, causing congestion and pushing average gas prices to 763 Gwei on January 5.

Q: Will the upgrade boost MATIC’s price immediately?
A: Not necessarily. While the upgrade improves fundamentals, short-term price movements are influenced by broader market trends, regulatory news, and macroeconomic factors.

Q: How does Polygon’s utilization compare to Ethereum post-EIP-1559?
A: Both networks saw significant drops in average block utilization after implementing EIP-1559—Ethereum from ~97% to ~51%, Polygon from 60–90% down to under 50.7%, indicating improved efficiency and stability.


Keywords: Polygon London upgrade, EIP-1559, MATIC burn mechanism, blockchain gas fees, network utilization, deflationary tokens, public chain ranking